CTindex - Christian Today UK Interactive Catalogue
Society

Call for Media Guidelines After Latest Prophet Muhammad Cartoon Row

A recent cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad published by a Swedish newspaper and condemned in Islamic countries demonstrates the need for a journalistic code of standards when depicting religion, says a US-based advocacy group.

Posted: Thursday, September 13, 2007, 10:10 (BST)
Font Scale:A A A

New York, USA - A recent cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad published by a Swedish newspaper and condemned in Islamic countries demonstrates the need for a journalistic code of standards when depicting religion, says a US-based advocacy group that has now developed such a set of standards.

A charter developed by Institute on Religion and Public Policy in Washington DC, "takes into account the paramount principles of freedom of expression and freedom of religion or belief, and attempts to strike an appropriate balance that preserves both of these fundamental freedoms," said Joseph K. Grieboski, the institute's president.

Among other things, the charter's four-part declaration states, "A responsible media never promotes religious hatred. It scrupulously avoids engendering hostility towards religions and their members likely to lead to imminent violence or systematic deprivation of human rights."

On 5 September, a group of Swedish Muslims called off a demonstration after a meeting with the country's prime minister that followed the publication by the Nerikes Allehanda newspaper of a cartoon that placed the Prophet Muhammad's head on the body of a dog.

"I personally would never intentionally act in a way that could be perceived by other religions as provocative or offensive," Prime Minister Fredirk Reinfeldt was quoted as saying by the Agence France-Presse news agency. He also insisted that press freedom and freedom of expression were "an inalienable part of our country and our democracy".

Nerikes Allehanda commented, "It is only natural to feel offended. But that doesn't give one the right to curtail or annul others' freedom of expression. Freedom of expression is the lifeblood of democracy."

The Institute on Religion and Public Policy said its charter also states, "A responsible media does not refer to religions or religious institutions in a prejudicial, biased or pejorative context; when religious references are essential to the reported matter or facilitate understanding, they are made accurately, fairly, impartially and respectfully."

The publication of the Swedish cartoon stemmed from news coverage of attempts to exhibit drawings of Muhammad in the country. Citing security concerns, at least two art galleries declined to exhibit the drawings. Ulf Johansson, the editor of Nerikes Allehanda, defended his publication of the cartoon, and in a commentary on the issue criticised self-censorship among exhibition galleries.

Officials in Iran, Jordan, Pakistan and Egypt condemned the cartoon's publication, with a spokesperson for the Jordanian government saying, "Such cartoons do not serve interfaith dialogue and co-existence, in which Jordan believes."

The text of the Institute on Religion and Public Policy charter can be found at: www.mediacharter.org


[Source: ENI]





The comments below are readers' personal opinions and are in no way intended to reflect the editorial opinion of Christian Today.

Added: Saturday, September 15, 2007, 16:07 (BST)

I'm with FreeSpirit above. Also, there should be no curb on freedom of expression except where it's likely to incite violence. The only way cartoons of Mohammed can do that is if Muslims themselves commit violence, because they sure as hell are not going to cause Christians, Buddhists, atheists or New Agers to commit violence. Goodness! If religions cannot stand up to criticism, the poking of fun, ridicule (the way politicians, sportspeople, celebrities and people in ordinary life have to do every day), then what good are they?

Android, Wales, UK

Added: Saturday, September 15, 2007, 14:18 (BST)

To Comment from Free Spirit, England....

Ignorance, although blissful should not be publicized if you intend to maintain a semblance of dignity, which can better be maintained if the ignorant keep their mouth shut. Or Learn to Question your sources...because you are mis-informed.

If the face of Christ was on the body of a dog(or christ portrayed as a dog-heaven forbid). The reaction of believing Christians would be the same, to different extremes. As apparently is of Muslims, some asking for boycotts of Swedish products others going to the extreme of murder. All people are the same.

Concerned., Dallas, Tx

Added: Friday, September 14, 2007, 11:04 (BST)

Anyone who puts their faith, trust and belief in the teachings of a man who had sex with a little 9 year old child, and ordered that anyone who left his organisation after joining must be murdered, and had sex with various women within 24 hours of the death of their husbands (who were killed by his men) should be given therapy to help free them from the cult which has indoctrinated them. All forms of organised ignorance and mass delusion need to be brought to an end by educated human beings who are in control of their own minds.

Free Spirit, England, UK

Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here
World Headline
Italy government to appeal ruling on classroom crucifixes

Italy government to appeal ruling on classroom crucifixes

The Italian government is to appeal a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights last week determining that the...
Sponsored Features
Bible Educational Services is committed to telling the next generation the praiseworthy deeds of the Lord. Psalm 78: 4. To download free bible lessons or learn about Postal Bible Schools visit Enrich your love life, marriage and relationships through education and counselling. Train to become a certified marriage and family educator and change lives for good. 16,500 native missionaries reaching the most unreached with Christ's love. Get your free book today.
Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here