Shroud of Turin's DNA traced to India and plants found 'all over Earth,' new study says

The revered Shroud of Turin, which some Christians believe is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ, may have come from India and transported to its current home in Turin, Italy, a group of Italian researchers said.

In a study published in RealClearScience.com, the researchers said the 14-foot-long garment contains DNA from plants found "all over Earth."

"Here we report the main findings from the analysis of genomic DNA extracted from dust particles vacuumed from parts of the body image and the lateral edge used for radiocarbon dating," said Dr. Gianni Barcaccia, a plant genetics and genomics professor at the University of Padova in Italy, in a paper he co-authored with his colleagues.

The researchers said they sequenced the DNA of pollen and dust found on the shroud and discovered several plant groups native to the Mediterranean.

They also linked the pollen and dust DNA to other plant groups in Asia, the Middle East, and even the Americas.

They surmised that the cloth must have been introduced at a time after the medieval period.

Moreover, the findings, which were also published in the journal Scientific Reports on Oct. 5, suggested that the cloth may have originated in India and then transported from the Near East to Italy.

The Shroud of Turin appears to show a double image of a bearded man "who suffered physical trauma in a manner consistent with crucifixion after being beaten, scourged and crowned with thorns," the researchers said.

The latest findings appear to add doubts on the authenticity of the revered cloth, which continues to be a hotly debated issue.

In 1988, an international team of researchers conducted carbon testing on the cloth the results of which showed that the fibres dated back to between 1260 and 1390—more than a thousand years after the biblical date of Jesus' crucifixion, according to the Huffington Post.

However, this study was debunked in 2005 when another analysis was conducted by a retired chemist from Los Alamos National Laboratory. This analysis cast serious doubts on the 1988 study saying the material tested that year came from a patch applied to the shroud in medieval times.

The 2005 study put the age of the shroud at 1,300 to 3,000 years, which supports the assertion that it was indeed the cloth placed on Jesus Christ after he was taken down from the cross and buried.

Newsletter Stay up to date with Christian Today
related articles
New Documentary Aims to Prove Christ's Resurrection

New Documentary Aims to Prove Christ's Resurrection

Pope announces new display of Shroud of Turin

Pope announces new display of Shroud of Turin

Vatican researcher claims to find text on Shroud of Turin

Vatican researcher claims to find text on Shroud of Turin

Turin Shroud may be genuine, say Italian scientists

Turin Shroud may be genuine, say Italian scientists

Turin shroud is fake, probably just a medieval prop, says British historian
Turin shroud is fake, probably just a medieval prop, says British historian

Turin shroud is fake, probably just a medieval prop, says British historian

Results on investigations into fragments of the True Cross coming soon

Results on investigations into fragments of the True Cross coming soon

News
What should Christians make of Tommy Robinson?
What should Christians make of Tommy Robinson?

In demanding that the likes of Robinson be banned from the Oxford Union, the clergy are in effect setting their own limit on freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

Christian woman persecuted by Iranian regime sentenced to 9 years in prison
Christian woman persecuted by Iranian regime sentenced to 9 years in prison

A Christian convert in Iran has been sentenced to nine years and eight months in prison on trumped-up charges linked to state security and anti-government activity.

John Lennox fears AI is making us lazy
John Lennox fears AI is making us lazy

Christian media leaders heard calls for courage, authenticity and discernment at the recent Revive 2026 conference.

Does the Church of England need to re-think its messaging?
Does the Church of England need to re-think its messaging?

If you look at the Church of England’s communications all that it ever seems to highlight is the good works that Christians do to improve the temporal well-being of their neighbours. It is right to highlight these things, but they are not the primary reason for the Church’s existence.