More Americans back override of federal court rulings if state officials oppose them

More Americans, or one of three US voters, are now supporting the idea that states should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if their elected state officials disagree with them.

A poll was conducted by Rasmussen Reports after the US Supreme Courts issued decisions on Obamacare and same-sex marriage.

The survey was conducted among 1,000 likely voters from June 30 to July 1.

A total of 33 percent of the respondents said states should ignore federal court rulings, up from 24 percent in the same poll conducted last February.

Just over half, 52 percent, disagreed, down from 58 percent in the earlier survey. Fifteen percent remained undecided.

"Perhaps even more disturbing is that the voters who feel strongest about overriding the federal courts—Republicans and conservatives—are those who traditionally have been the most supportive of the Constitution and separation of powers," Rasmussen Reports said.

It claimed that under the Obama administration, "these voters have become increasingly suspicious and even hostile toward the federal government."

Fifty percent of Republican voters support the idea of states having the right to ignore federal court rulings compared to 22 percent among Democrat voters and 30 percent of voters who are not affiliated with either party.

The survey said 50 percent of conservative voters support this idea but just 27 percent among moderates and 15 percent among liberals.

A Rasmussen Reports poll on the US Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage said 49 percent of likely US voters agreed with the decision while 45 percent opposed it.

In an earlier poll, 26 percent of votes said President Obama should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country. A total of 43 percent of Democrats agreed while 81 percent of Republicans and 67 percent of unaffiliated voters disagreed.

related articles
US Supreme Court set to rule on abortion restrictions in Texas
US Supreme Court set to rule on abortion restrictions in Texas

US Supreme Court set to rule on abortion restrictions in Texas

Victory for Obama as Supreme Court backs healthcare reforms
Victory for Obama as Supreme Court backs healthcare reforms

Victory for Obama as Supreme Court backs healthcare reforms

US Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage nationwide
US Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage nationwide

US Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage nationwide

Justice Scalia: Supreme Court ruling on gay union a threat to democracy
Justice Scalia: Supreme Court ruling on gay union a threat to democracy

Justice Scalia: Supreme Court ruling on gay union a threat to democracy

After its Obamacare ruling, Supreme Court becomes issue in US election
After its Obamacare ruling, Supreme Court becomes issue in US election

After its Obamacare ruling, Supreme Court becomes issue in US election

Obama gets image boost with 2 Supreme  Court decisions, Charleston church eulogy
Obama gets image boost with 2 Supreme Court decisions, Charleston church eulogy

Obama gets image boost with 2 Supreme Court decisions, Charleston church eulogy

News
Three words that changed history: ‘Jesus became sin'
Three words that changed history: ‘Jesus became sin'

As we enter Easter, we want to centre our attention on the significance of Christ’s work of redemption for all of humanity.

Gloucester Cathedral to unveil stunning new pipe organ
Gloucester Cathedral to unveil stunning new pipe organ

Gloucester Cathedral has said that this year’s Organ Festival will be extra special, as it will see the unveiling of its brand new organ.

Religious freedom violations increasing in Nicaragua
Religious freedom violations increasing in Nicaragua

The situation has declined since 2018.

Päivi Räsänen calls for repeal of hate speech laws across Europe after shock conviction
Päivi Räsänen calls for repeal of hate speech laws across Europe after shock conviction

All copies of a decades old pamphlet are to be destroyed after Finland's former Minister of the Interior was convicted of hate speech - even though the law that convicted her did not exist at the time the pamphlet was published.