Zara's 'holocaust' top and eight more fashion industry disasters

Fashion company Zara has promised to withdraw its child's t-shirt accused of looking like the holocaust-era uniform for Jews.

The blue and white striped top with six-point gold star badge was intended to be a sheriff's outfit, but instead is reminiscent of the green and white striped uniforms and yellow Star of David that Jews were forced to wear in Nazi concentration camps.

Inditex, the company that owns Zara and the world's biggest fashion retailer, said in a statement that the company "would like to reiterate its utmost respect for all cultures and religions," adding: "The Group condemns and rejects any form of discrimination."

But this isn't the first time the Spanish fashion retailer has faced criticism for its lack of discernment. Earlier this month Zara had to withdraw a t-shirt with the slogan "White is the new black" on it, following criticism that it could be read as racist.

Really, Zara? "White is the new black"? pic.twitter.com/t9oinC5cuU

— Helen Rosner (@hels) July 29, 2014 " data-caption="null" data-credit="null">

In 2007, Zara also had to withdraw a bag, after a customer pointed out that it had a swastika embroidered on it.

But Zara isn't the only fashion company to commit such faux pas. In July, Topshop had to withdraw its 'yellow face' necklace, as it was said to be racist towards Chinese people.

So @TopShop just took racism to a new level: Well, This Yellowface Topshop Necklace Is Just Awful http://t.co/QuwADGM5CW (via @refinery29)

— Rachel Ma (@rxmxa) July 10, 2014 " data-caption="null" data-credit="null">

Topman also came up against widespread critcicism for printing t-shirts with sexist jokes in 2011 – one comparing women to dogs, and the other appearing to offer excuses for domestic abuse.

In March, H&M had to withdraw a top with an image of a skull inside a Star of David. Elder of Ziyon shared pictures of the top on his blog, comparing it with the skull and hexogram symbol seen in occult imagery.

And last year's Halloween costumes caused significant controversy for lack of taste. Walmart took its 'turban beard' costume off the shelves, while Asda's and Tesco's 'mental patient' costumes as well as Amazon's zombie costume modelled on child sex-abuser Jimmy Saville also caused significant embarrassment before being withdrawn.

Each incident is a reminder that despite the number of people involved in producing an item from design to shop floor, fast fashion doesn't leave much time for discernment.

related articles
Where is God in the fashion industry?
Where is God in the fashion industry?

Where is God in the fashion industry?

Who are the real slaves to fashion?
Who are the real slaves to fashion?

Who are the real slaves to fashion?

The pull of Primark: are we ignoring the dark side of fast fashion?
The pull of Primark: are we ignoring the dark side of fast fashion?

The pull of Primark: are we ignoring the dark side of fast fashion?

10 weirdest Christian gifts

10 weirdest Christian gifts

News
When ‘my truth’ replaces the truth
When ‘my truth’ replaces the truth

We live in changing times, where feelings about how we “identify” now hold more authority than facts.

Christian pro-life volunteer denies five fresh charges in abortion buffer zone case
Christian pro-life volunteer denies five fresh charges in abortion buffer zone case

A Christian charity volunteer has pleaded not guilty to five charges of breaching an abortion clinic buffer zone in Birmingham, as her lawyers challenge whether the prosecution should proceed.

Can we really think ourselves happy?
Can we really think ourselves happy?

There is growing evidence that people living with neglected tropical diseases, including leprosy, experience significantly higher rates of depression and anxiety, with discrimination and social exclusion among the factors contributing to this burden.

Proposed SNP conversion therapy ban could 'weaken trust' within the home
Proposed SNP conversion therapy ban could 'weaken trust' within the home

Parents and pastors may be required by law to affirm only one view.