Gay couple drop bid for more compensation from Christian B&B owners

Peter and Hazelmary Bull were ordered by a judge in January to pay £3,600 in damages to civil partners Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall.

The court ruled that the Bulls' policy of reserving double rooms for heterosexual married couples only broke equality laws.

When deciding upon the level of damages, the judge had taken the Bulls’ Christian beliefs into consideration.

Preddy and Hall were represented in their case by the taxpayer-funded Equality Commission, which had been seeking an increase in the damages on the grounds that Christian beliefs should hold no sway over the level of compensation.

However, the Commission withdrew the legal action, saying its bid had been an “error of judgement”.

According to the Christian Institute, which represented the Bulls, legal director of the Commission John Wadham said: “This morning we withdrew our cross appeal in this case.

“It was filed initially because of an error of judgement on the part of our legal team. They submitted the cross appeal in an attempt to clarify the law around how damages are calculated in cases such as this.

“This resulted in it appearing that Steve Preddy and Martyn Hall were seeking to increase the amount of damages they receive because Mr and Mrs Bull’s Christian beliefs had led them to break the law.

“This was not our intention and it was certainly not the intention of Steve and Martyn.

“I would like to confirm that public money will not be spent funding a claim for increased damages in this case.”

In a joint statement, Preddy and Hall said: “We brought this case to clarify the law, not to make money. We have always believed that the original award was a fair one, and are not seeking any further compensation.”

The Christian Institute welcomed the decision to withdraw the action, saying it had been “heartless” to seek more compensation from the Bulls.

Mike Judge, of the Christian Institute, said: “We are pleased that the Commission has seen sense and withdrawn their demand for a stiffer penalty against Mr and Mrs Bull.

“However, this u-turn has come only after negative publicity.

“Last week the Commission had to apologise for saying children may be at risk from being ‘infected’ with the moral values of Christian foster parents.

“The Commission’s approach to these equality cases has seriously damaged Christians’ confidence in the Commission, which ought to be acting as an impartial defender of everyone’s human rights.

“A great deal of damage has been done.”
related articles
Judge rules against Christian guesthouse owners who refused civil partners

Judge rules against Christian guesthouse owners who refused civil partners

Christian guesthouse owners to appeal ruling in double room case

Christian guesthouse owners to appeal ruling in double room case

High Court upholds bar on Christian foster carers over homosexuality views

High Court upholds bar on Christian foster carers over homosexuality views

British courts are 'set against religious freedom for Christians' - barrister

British courts are 'set against religious freedom for Christians' - barrister

News
Christian nurse Jennifer Melle supports Sandie Peggie in latest tribunal
Christian nurse Jennifer Melle supports Sandie Peggie in latest tribunal

Jennifer Melle was vindicated in her own case and is now supporting Scottish nurse Sandie Peggie.

Australia's anti-therapy laws harm the most vulnerable - Britain should not copy them
Australia's anti-therapy laws harm the most vulnerable - Britain should not copy them

As a former gay activist, I can assure you that the content of the draft bill to ban so-called conversion therapy demonstrates categorically that the UK Government has only listened to one side of the story.

Survey finds Gen Z most likely to identify as religious
Survey finds Gen Z most likely to identify as religious

Generation Z adults are more likely than older Americans to describe themselves as “religious,” even as many also engage in practices at odds with Christian teaching, according to a new survey. 

Why the Archbishop of Canterbury’s award controversy matters
Why the Archbishop of Canterbury’s award controversy matters

The Archbishop’s award controversy exposes a political risk for the Church.