Finland's Eurovision entrant planning gay marriage protest

Finland's entrant to this year's Eurovision Song Contest is planning a "surprise" at the end of her performance on 18 May to make known her support for gay marriage.

Same-sex civil partnerships have been recognised in Finland since 2002 but gay marriage has not been legalised.

The country's Eurovision entrant Krista Siegfrids will be performing her song "Marry Me" at the annual contest, which takes place this year in Sweden.

The audience at a Eurovision concert in Amsterdam last week were stunned when the 27-year-old singer locked lips with one of her female backing dancers during the performance.

Political gestures or lyrics are not allowed in entrants' performances under Eurovision Song Contest rules.

However, Siegfrids said in the Independent on Sunday: "Homophobic people are angry with me for doing this. But I'm planning a surprise at the end of my performance. It's live on TV, so nobody can stop me."

She added: "I don't think 'Marry Me' is political. It's about love and tolerance. But gay marriage is not allowed in Finland and that's wrong. I wanted to make a statement about that."

News
Christian widows in Nigeria hold fast to faith as they rebuild lives after violence
Christian widows in Nigeria hold fast to faith as they rebuild lives after violence

Hundreds of Christian widows in Nigeria’s Plateau State are putting their lives back together after losing husbands, homes and livelihoods to violence.

8 killed in attack on church in Jordan
8 killed in attack on church in Jordan

In response to the shooting, Church leaders vowed that Christians will not be driven from their homeland.

The Christian candidate who lost the election but won my respect
The Christian candidate who lost the election but won my respect

Helen Spiby-Vann secured just 63 votes in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election, but her campaign made me reconsider the value of an explicitly Christian voice in politics, writes Christian Hacking.

Can we afford the society we have created?
Can we afford the society we have created?

Is spending spiralling out of control? Should the state be doing everything we expect of it, or can we simply no longer afford the society we have created?