Archbishop of Canterbury Responds to British Airways Cross Decision
The Archbishop of Canterbury has defended the right of people of faith to be able to wear their religious symbols in public after a British Airways check-in worker lost her appeal against the company which said she could only wear it under her scarf.
by Maria Mackay
Posted: Sunday, November 26, 2006, 7:14 (GMT)
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, has responded to the announcement at the end of last week that a British Airways employee had lost her appeal against the company's decision to stop her from wearing a cross necklace.
Earlier last week, Nadia Eweida, 55, lost her appeal against British Airways which stated that she could not wear the cross if she kept it visible while working at the BA check-in counter.
Dr Williams responded to the news by reaffirming his previous statement earlier in the month that it was "absolutely basic that people of any faith should have the right to display the signs of their faith commitment in public".
He continued: "What I find deeply confusing about the present situation is the response of BA, which doesn't seem to make it clear whether they're simply talking about regulations, concerning a piece of jewellery, or whether they are in some sense claiming that the cross is a source of offence.
"Now if BA is really saying or implying that the wearing of a cross in public is a source of offence, then I regard that as deeply offensive and, in a society where religious liberty and the expression of religious commitment is free, I regard it as something really quite serious.
"If they're saying that it's to do with matters of health and safety, I would question whether that is a sensible kind of regulation, whether in fact there really is a problem here, and I would ask them to look very seriously at this, given the enormous reaction of dismay that's been caused in the Christian community."
Dr Williams added that members of the Church of England had already raised the issue with the Church Commissioners as to whether the Church should continue to fly with British Airways, in which it has some financial investment.
BA announced at the end of last week it would review its policy on uniforms following the enormous backlash against its decision.
Copyright © 2009 Christian Today. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
The comments below are readers' personal opinions and are in no way intended to reflect the editorial opinion of Christian Today.
Added: Sunday, November 26, 2006, 19:50 (GMT)
Suffice it to say, I will never fly British Airways and will make sure everyone I know does the same. Does British Airways ban burkas on Muslim women that are in their employ? Do they ban any Muslim employees from their many daily prayers? I highly doubt it.
V.A. Wilder, bellville, texas usa
Added: Sunday, November 26, 2006, 14:55 (GMT)
Praise the Lord that someone within the Christian Church has at last seen the merits of standing up for their Faith without feeling the necessity of simultaneously apologising it.
BA is out of order, it would seem they have appointed themselves both judge and jury regarding what may be considered offensive to some of their clients/operatives. I find it deeply offensive as does Dr Williams (according to this article) for BA to make decisions about an individuals faith and their right to quietly proclaim that faith, they have reverted back to the 'FLY THE FLAG' logo proudly proclaiming a belief in their company. Perhaps BA's intention is to show the door to those of us who also proudly display through the wearing of a symbol of our faith. I hope, if this is the case that we Christians no matter our denomination would boldly walk through that door and wipe the dust from our feet. Do we serve God or Mamon?
Lionel Morley, Lockerbie, Scotland
