Mayor cancels U.S. citizenship ceremony after officials ban opening prayer

 AP

A New Jersey town cancelled a federal citizenship ceremony last week after immigration officials refused to allow an opening prayer.

Carteret, New Jersey was invited to host the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' (UCIS) naturalization ceremony, but the event was moved to Newark after Carteret Mayor Daniel Reiman insisted on including the prayer.

The ceremony, which naturalized 30 people on Saturday, requires citizens to recite the Pledge of Allegiance- which contains the words "under God," - and an oath that contains the phrase "so help me God." UCIS officials say that a prayer, however, defies the department's policy.

UCIS spokesperson Katie Tichacek Kaplan said that the omission makes sure the ceremonies are "conducted in a meaningful manner which is welcoming and inclusive and excludes political, commercial and religious statements," according to the Associated Press.

Mayor Reiman told UCIS that opening government meetings and ceremonies with a prayer are a tradition in Carteret, and that the prayer would be nondenominational, but the agency refused to allow the moment of reverence.

Reiman opted out of the ceremony.

"I told they're no longer allowed to use city hall," he told The Star-Ledger.

The mayor also told the Associated Press that UCIS can "host its godless ceremony someplace else."

On May 5, the Supreme Court allowed prayers in local government meetings, but UCIS argued that the ruling does not apply to federal agencies.

American Atheist spokesman Dave Muscato said the immigration department made the right decision.

"The major reason people come here is religious freedom," Muscato told The Star-Ledger. "The vision of the Founding Fathers is that the government doesn't dictate your beliefs for you."

He also contended that there is no such thing as a nondiscriminatory prayer. "You can call it nondenominational, but there's no such thing as a prayer that's inclusive of everyone," Muscato said. "Prayer is by definition exclusive to non-religious people."

Reiman called the agency's decision a shame. "For them to take that away is unfortunate, and I think it's a disgrace," he told The Star-Ledger. "They're welcome to go somewhere else."

Newsletter Stay up to date with Christian Today
News
What should Christians make of Tommy Robinson?
What should Christians make of Tommy Robinson?

In demanding that the likes of Robinson be banned from the Oxford Union, the clergy are in effect setting their own limit on freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

Christian woman persecuted by Iranian regime sentenced to 9 years in prison
Christian woman persecuted by Iranian regime sentenced to 9 years in prison

A Christian convert in Iran has been sentenced to nine years and eight months in prison on trumped-up charges linked to state security and anti-government activity.

John Lennox fears AI is making us lazy
John Lennox fears AI is making us lazy

Christian media leaders heard calls for courage, authenticity and discernment at the recent Revive 2026 conference.

Does the Church of England need to re-think its messaging?
Does the Church of England need to re-think its messaging?

If you look at the Church of England’s communications all that it ever seems to highlight is the good works that Christians do to improve the temporal well-being of their neighbours. It is right to highlight these things, but they are not the primary reason for the Church’s existence.