European court accused of overreach after ruling against Poland in disability abortion case

The European Court of Human Rights
The European Court of Human Rights (Photo: Getty/iStock)

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has come under criticism after ruling against Poland in a case concerning abortion on the grounds of disability. 

The legal challenge was brought by a woman who travelled abroad for an abortion after Poland’s 2020 Constitutional Tribunal decision to strike down abortion on the grounds of fetal disability. The woman travelled abroad for the abortion after her baby was diagnosed with a severe abnormality. 

Poland's 2020 court decision affirmed that unborn children with disabilities deserve equal protection under the law and that every human being has an inherent dignity. 

The ECHR has now ruled that the rights of the woman were violated. This follows a previous 2023 ruling by the ECHR that Poland's change to the law in disability-based abortions was a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to private and family life.

Dr Felix Böllmann, Director of European Advocacy for legal advocacy group ADF International (ADF) criticised the November 13 ruling, arguing that Poland was within its rights to determine its own laws on the matter.

“With this judgment the European Court of Human Rights has interfered in a matter that belongs squarely under Polish jurisdiction," he said. 

"Poland has both the sovereign prerogative and the duty to protect all innocent human life.

"Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal acted courageously to protect children with disabilities from discrimination before birth — a goal fully consistent with international human rights law."

He said the judgment was a "troubling" sign that the ECHR was "willing to overstep its role". 

It follows a recent joint letter signed by nine EU countries - Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland - which called for an “open-minded conversation” about how the European Convention on Human Rights is interpreted. 

“The Court should return to its original mission of protecting genuine human rights, not inventing false ones,” Böllmann continued.

He called on EU institutions to protect the unborn, and respect the right of nations to legislate in accordance with their own constitutional and moral frameworks. 

“The European Court should uphold, not undermine, the fundamental right to life, and this ruling severely undermines the right to life of the disabled unborn. No baby should suffer life-ending discrimination in the womb," he said.

News
Iran conflict could open doors for the Gospel, says mission agency
Iran conflict could open doors for the Gospel, says mission agency

EEM is also calling for prayers for those impacted by the conflict.

War disrupts Holy Week in Jerusalem
War disrupts Holy Week in Jerusalem

The impact of the escalating conflict in the Middle East region is being felt keenly in Jerusalem.

Thousands gather for installation of Sarah Mullally as 106th Archbishop of Canterbury
Thousands gather for installation of Sarah Mullally as 106th Archbishop of Canterbury

Dame Sarah Mullally has been formally installed today as the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury and the first woman to hold the role in the Church of England’s 1,400-year history.

Church leaders condemn antisemitic ambulance attack
Church leaders condemn antisemitic ambulance attack

Christian leaders have been united in their condemnation of a firebomb attack on four ambulances operated by a Jewish charity.