Millennials embracing online reality more than baby boomers

A new survey has revealed significant differences between millennials and baby boomers when it comes to attitudes towards the internet.

While millennials (ages 18 to 34) and baby boomers (35+) were both reluctant allow access to their personal data and web behaviour, millennials were more willing to compromise some of their privacy where there was a perceived benefit.

When asked about the statement, "No one should ever be allowed to have access to my personal data or web behavior," 70 per cent of millennials agreed, compared with 77 per cent of users 35 and older.

When asked if they would share their location with companies in order to receive coupons or deals for nearby businesses, 56 per cent of millennials agreed, compared to 42 per cent of users aged 35 and older.

And when asked if they would share information with companies "as long as I get something in return", 51 per cent of millennials agreed, compared to 40 per cent of those age 35 and older.

Social networks have also become a normal part of day to day communication for millennials in a way that they haven't for over-35s.

The average number of people millennials say they regularly contact through social networking sites is 18, compared to only five for users over the age of 35.

Millennials also use social networking sites far more frequently, with almost half of millennials (48 per cent) saying they visit social networking websites several times a day. This compares to only one in five users aged 35 or older.

The survey was conducted by the USC Annenberg Center for the Digital Future and Bovitz Inc.

"Millennials think differently when it comes to online privacy," said Elaine B Coleman, managing director of media and emerging technologies for Bovitz.

"It's not that they don't care about it - rather they perceive social media as an exchange or an economy of ideas, where sharing involves participating in smart ways.

"Millennials say, 'I'll give up some personal information if I get something in return.' For older users, sharing is a function of trust - 'the more I trust, the more I am willing to share'."

A separate survey of over 1,000 US internet users out this week from Abine found that baby boomers and millennials are even starting to define privacy in different terms.

Baby boomers were 74 per cent more likely to choose a traditional, offline description of privacy - "the right to be free from others watching me".

Millennials were 177 per cent more likely to choose a modern, data-centric definition - "being able to delete anything about me online".

What they have in common is that privacy is important to both, with 90% of all respondents agreeing that they worry about their privacy.

Eighty-five per cent were worried about giving out their credit card numbers online, while 82% were uncomfortable with sharing their personal contact details.

Millennials were 84 per cent more likely to distrust Facebook with their data.

"Consumers rate privacy as more important than ever, yet they have less control over when and where their personal information is shared than ever before," said Bill Kerrigan, Abine chief executive.

News
People view religious education positively, study finds
People view religious education positively, study finds

The government is consulting on plans to add RE to the national curriculum.

Archbishop of Canterbury withdraws award given to Muslim cleric who praised Bin Laden
Archbishop of Canterbury withdraws award given to Muslim cleric who praised Bin Laden

Reform leader Nigel Farage said the decision to award Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi was "astonishing". 

How the new General Synod could move beyond the present disagreement over same-sex relationships
How the new General Synod could move beyond the present disagreement over same-sex relationships

How might the next Synod make progress in the next five years based on a recognition that there are those in the Church of England who hold fundamentally opposed positions on the matter? Is there a way of allowing both sides to achieve what they want? Martin Davie argues that the answer to this question is ‘Yes.’

No part of London should become a free speech, gospel exclusion zone
No part of London should become a free speech, gospel exclusion zone

Soho is not exempt from freedom of speech and Christian expression. And Christians do not lose their fundamental freedoms when they cross an invisible boundary into a neighbourhood associated with a different worldview. The streets of London belong to all of us, writes Andrea Williams.