California bill seeks to promote free or low-cost abortion in licensed clinics

A bill that will require licensed clinics to notify clients of state programs that offer abortion services has been passed by the California State Assembly and is now in the State Senate.

AB 775, or the Reproductive FACT (Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency) Act, is authored by Assembly members David Chiu and Auturm Burke.

The legislation "would require a licensed covered facility, as defined, to disseminate a notice to all clients, as specified, stating, among other things, that California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women."

Under the bill, the notice should read, "California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion for eligible women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social services office at [insert the telephone number]."

In addition, the bill "will require an unlicensed covered facility, as defined, to disseminate a notice to all clients, as specified, stating, among other things, that the facility is not licensed as a medical facility by the State of California."

Facilities that fail to comply will be fined $500 for the first offense and $1,000 for each subsequent offense.

The California Catholic Conference is opposing the bill, saying that in actuality it "discriminates against those pregnancy centers / clinics that hold a pro-life viewpoint."

"This bill is prescriptive and in direct violation of our First Amendments Right for Free Speech. AB 775 would impose double standards of operation for different clinics," the conference said.

It deemed the bill as unfair as it "may discourage women from getting the information and assistance that they need and deserve."

The bill, it said, would expose many licensed pregnancy centers/clinics, including its directors and board members, to criminal or civil sanctions for failure to comply.

"Neither medical centres nor those offering non-medical social support should be forced to provide a politically-motivated, government-mandated disclaimer or advertisements," the conference said.

related articles
Abortion decline in Canada; Pro-life groups celebrate steady drop in abortions in British Columbia

Abortion decline in Canada; Pro-life groups celebrate steady drop in abortions in British Columbia

More Americans are pro-choice than pro-life for first time in 7 years
More Americans are pro-choice than pro-life for first time in 7 years

More Americans are pro-choice than pro-life for first time in 7 years

Pope Francis laments civilisation woes amid rise in crimes against life
Pope Francis laments civilisation woes amid rise in crimes against life

Pope Francis laments civilisation woes amid rise in crimes against life

News
Understanding Jewish Law as rebellion
Understanding Jewish Law as rebellion

Jewish academic and Hebrew scholar Irene Lancaster reflects on the October 7 2023 anniversary, a timely statement from Church of England interfaith advisers, and fresh perspectives on Jewish Law.

Christian Legal Centre welcomes NHS England trans guidance
Christian Legal Centre welcomes NHS England trans guidance

It is hoped the new guidance will prevent more cases like the Darlington nurses.

Euthanasia cases in Belgium doubled in last five years
Euthanasia cases in Belgium doubled in last five years

Euthanasia now accounts for 4% of deaths in Belgium.

Research uncovers some of the reasons why young people go to church
Research uncovers some of the reasons why young people go to church

Men were more likely to go for politics and women for support, but the main reason for both overall was faith.