Temporary block placed on Texas abortion law

A US federal judge has temporarily suspended enforcement of a new law banning most abortions in the state of Texas. 

The move comes after the justice department filed an emergency motion to stop enforcement of the law while the White House contests its legality.

Explaining his decision to suspend enforcement, District Judge Robert Pitman said "women have been unlawfully prevented from exercising control over their lives in ways that are protected by the Constitution".

"This court will not sanction one more day of this offensive deprivation of such an important right," he said.

Senate Bill 8 was passed by Texas' Republican legislators and signed by Republican governor Greg Abbott in May.

It became known as the "Heartbeat Act" because it bans the abortion of unborn babies with a detectable heartbeat - mostly from around six weeks.

Pro-life group The Lozier Institute estimates that 132 unborn babies will be saved each day because of the law. 

The Biden administration is intervening after the Supreme Court - which has a conservative majority - refused to stop Texas from enacting the law. 


READ MORE: Abortion in the USA: What is happening in Texas?


The White House said the district judge's ruling was "an important step" to restoring the constitutional rights of women in Texas.

Abortion providers in the state, who want the law struck down permanently, have said that with the restrictions lifted for now, abortions will be resumed as soon as possible. 

This is despite a clause in the law threatening legal reprisals for abortions carried out while an emergency injunction is in place.

In his ruling, Judge Pitman addressed this clause and said it was "of questionable legality".

Defending the Heartbeat Act, pro-life group The Susan B Anthony List said the law is "compassionate" and should be protected by the Supreme Court.

"The people of Texas spoke through their legislators: They want to protect babies with beating hearts. Now an unelected judge has stepped in and blocked it," it said.

"This has played out for decades and must end. It's time for SCOTUS [the US Supreme Court] to rule in Dobbs and hand the issue back to the people."

News
People view religious education positively, study finds
People view religious education positively, study finds

The government is consulting on plans to add RE to the national curriculum.

Archbishop of Canterbury withdraws award given to Muslim cleric who praised Bin Laden
Archbishop of Canterbury withdraws award given to Muslim cleric who praised Bin Laden

Reform leader Nigel Farage said the decision to award Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi was "astonishing". 

How the new General Synod could move beyond the present disagreement over same-sex relationships
How the new General Synod could move beyond the present disagreement over same-sex relationships

How might the next Synod make progress in the next five years based on a recognition that there are those in the Church of England who hold fundamentally opposed positions on the matter? Is there a way of allowing both sides to achieve what they want? Martin Davie argues that the answer to this question is ‘Yes.’

No part of London should become a free speech, gospel exclusion zone
No part of London should become a free speech, gospel exclusion zone

Soho is not exempt from freedom of speech and Christian expression. And Christians do not lose their fundamental freedoms when they cross an invisible boundary into a neighbourhood associated with a different worldview. The streets of London belong to all of us, writes Andrea Williams.