Society


NGOs sound alarm over UN 'defamation of religion' agenda

Posted: Thursday, November 12, 2009, 17:32 (GMT)

Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) is among a hundred NGOs to have signed a statement decrying the ongoing “Combating Defamation of Religion” agenda at the United Nations.

It fears that a new, legally-binding international treaty limiting the criticism of religion may become a reality.

The NGOs, which include Christian, Muslim and Jewish organisations as well as humanist and secular groups from around the world, argue that “unlike traditional defamation laws, which punish false statements of fact that harm individual persons, measures prohibiting the `defamation of religions’ punish the peaceful criticism of ideas”.

"United Nations resolutions on the `defamation of religions’ are incompatible with the fundamental freedoms of individuals to freely exercise and peacefully express their thoughts, ideas, and beliefs," the statement says.

Pakistan and Nigeria have declared in a UN meeting that they are seeking a new legally-binding treaty that would enforce limits on freedom of expression with regard to religion, signifying a bold new development according to the Washington DC-based Becket Fund.

Such calls will be strengthened as the UN General Assembly looks set to pass another controversial resolution next month entitled “Combating the Defamation of Religion”, its fifth in five years.

Tina Lambert, CSW’s Advocacy Director said: “In seeking to protect ‘religion’ from defamation it is clear that existing international human rights protections will be undermined, specifically freedom of religion and belief and freedom of expression.

"A legally-binding treaty would enable states to justify dubious domestic legislation such as the blasphemy law in Pakistan as a ‘human rights’ requirement.

"For the sake of those who already suffer unjustly under such legislation and for the protection of our existing international human rights framework, it is vital that member states act to prevent such a treaty or optional protocol being established.”

Advertisement – Bypass advertisement

 

Externally generated - Report offensive links here

Advertisement – Bypass advertisement

Opinion

What's the problem with sending Bibles to schools?

What's the problem with sending Bibles to schools?

The idea that kids need to be protected from the Bible is an insult...

Advertisement – Bypass advertisement

Advertisement – Bypass advertisement

Externally generated - Report offensive links here