CTindex - Christian Today UK Interactive Catalogue
Church

Kirk Report on Homosexuality a "Major Disappointment"

A report on the Church of Scotland's position on homosexuality has been labelled a "major disappointment" by a group of evangelicals within the Church of Scotland.

by Maria Mackay
Posted: Friday, April 27, 2007, 10:48 (BST)
Font Scale:A A A

A long-awaited report on homosexuality from the Church of Scotland's Mission & Discipleship Council has been described as a "major disappointment" by a group of evangelicals who said it failed to give clear theological guidance on the issue.

The "A challenge to unity" report, which will now be presented to the General Assembly in May, intended to offer theological perspectives on same-sex partnerships and human sexuality. It concluded that gay and lesbian members have a right to serve in the Church so long as they remain celibate and that homosexual orientation did not preclude service to Christ and the Church.

OneKirk, a liberal group in the Church of Scotland, welcomed the conclusions of the report, which took two years to write, saying it was "encouraged by the further movement in this latest report to greater openness within the Church of Scotland".

But the Rev Ian Watson, Secretary of Forward Together, a group of evangelicals in the Church of Scotland, said, however, "The report is a major disappointment in that it merely describes the two positions that are held in the Church - the evangelical and the liberal - but it really doesn't tell us anything new about the debate."

The Rev Peter Johnston, Convenor of the OneKirk Working Group, said: "Some may question whether the report has been a waste of time. I do not believe OneKirk members would draw that conclusion. The report is a part of a longer process and therefore represents a fair and honest appraisal of where the Church of Scotland is at this time on the subject."

The 12-member working group behind the report comprised of 12 liberals and evangelicals. They also concluded that the Church had shown a "historically intolerant" attitude towards gay people.

OneKirk welcomed the Church's "humble admission" that it had been insensitive to gay and lesbian people in the past.

"I think we've got to own up to that," said Rev Watson.

The report has identified a number of questions which the Church of Scotland should address in coming years, including whether homosexual acts are sinful, the extent to which faithful gay and lesbian relationships are akin to marriages, and whether ministers may conduct a liturgy for a couple following a civil partnership.

Rev Watson said he expected there would be anger among some Church members who expected the report to give clear theological guidance on the issue of homosexuality.

"But there is absolutely nothing new in this report," said Rev Watson. "I just don't see how it's going to contribute to the debate."

The report concluded with a call to both sides of the debate to continue to listen to one another. "There is little to be gained, and rather much to be lost, by one set of views being stampeded over, and against the conscience of others," it said.



Copyright © 2009 Christian Today. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
The comments below are readers' personal opinions and are in no way intended to reflect the editorial opinion of Christian Today.

Added: Sunday, June 10, 2007, 20:07 (BST)

Rev. Watson says that the report simply describes the two positions on the issue - the evangelical and the liberal. It may come as news to him that there are many Evangelicals who do not share the Forward Together views, and find them un-Biblical. One possible reason why it may be news to him is that any contrary view expressed within the Evangelical camp is thoroughly suppressed or airbrushed out.

I alway thought that "Evangelical" meant taking Scripture as one's sole authority, but today it means taking what some "Evangelicals" say Scripture says as the sole authority. There is a difference, and there was a whole reformation over it in the sixteenth Century.

Jethro, Scotland

Added: Friday, April 27, 2007, 19:08 (BST)

If i'm understanding this article correctly, then what i read is a clear mis-interpetation of GOD's word. The issue at stake is not aligning doctrine with truth and seeking to become politically correct, GOD's word is clear on this issue "it is a sin" un-natural acts. The question that should be addressed is this, lead them to GOD's word the TRUTH, in LOVE, rebuke a brother and sister in love be an example of JESUS, HE came not for the healthy but for the sick, we are all sinners and we who are saved are only saved by grace thru FAITH. JESUS' example of this, love the sinner, hate the sin, and follow HIS wonderful example of love thru GOD the FATHER, but by no means should we take GOD's word and make it fit a situation.
GOD is the same GOD, Yesterday, Today and FOREVER.. May GOD give you wisdom and Discernment in this matter. I will be praying for you.
A Brother in CHRIST.

Ron Maldonado, Younstown, Ohio USA

Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here
World Headline
Archbishop calls for renewable energy in South Africa

Archbishop calls for renewable energy in South Africa

The Archbishop of Cape Town has called on South Africa's troubled energy provider Eskom to drop its plans to build more...
Sponsored Features
Bible Educational Services is committed to telling the next generation the praiseworthy deeds of the Lord. Psalm 78: 4. To download free bible lessons or learn about Postal Bible Schools visit Enrich your love life, marriage and relationships through education and counselling. Train to become a certified marriage and family educator and change lives for good. 16,500 native missionaries reaching the most unreached with Christ's love. Get your free book today.
Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here