UK shouldn't be lecturing US on Roe v Wade, says Conservative MP

Conservative MP Danny Kruger has spoken against the suggestion that the UK make representations to the US government over the Supreme Court's decision to strike down Roe v Wade. 

The historic decision last Friday overturned the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that enshrined a legal right to abortion in the US. It means that individual states should decide their own abortion laws. 

In the UK Parliament on Tuesday, it was suggested by pro-abortion Labour MP Diana Johnson that UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss make representations to the US government "about ensuring that women's rights to access reproductive healthcare are protected as part of her department's work on promoting human rights internationally".

Most MPs spoke during the debate to support a "right" to "safe abortions" and to call the Supreme Court's decision a "backward step".

Kruger was among the few to express support for the Supreme Court's decision.

He said, "I recognise the degree of distress and concern felt by many Members in the House over the Supreme Court's decision.

"The fact is, though, that I probably disagree with most Members who have spoken so far on this matter. They think that women have an absolute right to bodily autonomy in this matter.

"However, I think that, in the case of abortion, that right is qualified by the fact that another body is involved. We can disagree on that question, but I offer to Members who are trying to talk me down that this is a proper topic for political debate.

"My point to the Minister on the Front Bench is that I do not understand why we are lecturing the United States on a judgment to return the power of decision over this political question to the states—to democratic decision-makers—rather than leaving it in the hands of the courts." 

Carla Lockhart, DUP MP for Upper Bann, observed in her comments during the debate that "abortion is not and has not ever been deemed a human right in any binding international law".

She said, "In fact, almost the opposite is the case. Some internationally binding treaties reference a right to life, such as article 6 of the international covenant on civil and political rights, which states: 'Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law.'

"Part 5 of the same article specifically excludes pregnant women from the death penalty.

"Does the Minister not agree that giving legal protection to the unborn is, arguably, a clear recognition of the unborn life? America has done just that, and I welcome the bold and courageous decision." 

Jim Shannon, DUP MP for Strangford, urged the UK government to condemn the acts of violence and death threats that have followed the Supreme Court decision.

"I would defend the rights of the woman but especially the rights of the unborn child. Some in this House tend to disregard that," he said.

News
Christians urged to speak out against 'conversion practices' bill
Christians urged to speak out against 'conversion practices' bill

The call comes amid warnings from The Christian Institute that the proposals could threaten parental guidance and pastoral ministry.

Churches challenged to make single Christians feel fully part of church life
Churches challenged to make single Christians feel fully part of church life

Churches need to move beyond assumptions that marriage and family are the normal markers of a fulfilled Christian life and create communities where single people are fully valued, speakers at the inaugural Single Friendly Church Network conference have said. 

Liechtenstein Prince blocks abortion law reform, advocates greater support for mothers
Liechtenstein Prince blocks abortion law reform, advocates greater support for mothers

Liechtenstein’s Hereditary Prince Alois has refused to approve legislation that would have eased the country’s abortion restrictions, arguing that greater efforts should instead be made to support pregnant women.