Scottish court says legal definition of 'woman' excludes transsexuals

The legal definition of 'woman' cannot include trans women, a Scottish court has said.

The Court of Session ruled in favour of feminist group For Women Scotland in its legal challenge against an expanded definition in the Gender Representation on Public Boards Scotland Act 2018.

The legislation was part of the Scottish government's attempts to increase the presence of trans women on public boards. 

For Women Scotland argued that the definition undermines the rights of women as protected by the Equality Act. 

In her judgment, Lady Dorrian said that the term 'transgender women' was "not a protected characteristic".

She also argued that including transsexuals who self-identify as women in the legal definition "conflates and confuses two separate and distinct protected characteristics".

"Changing the definitions of protected characteristic, even for the purpose of achieving the gender recognition objective is not permitted and in this respect the 2018 Act is outwith legislative competence," she said. 

Her judgment overturns a previous ruling in favour of the Scottish government. 

It comes in the same week as another judge ruled that it is lawful for people to choose their sex in the upcoming Scottish census regardless of what is on their birth certificate. 

News
Archbishop of Canterbury withdraws award given to Muslim cleric who praised Bin Laden
Archbishop of Canterbury withdraws award given to Muslim cleric who praised Bin Laden

Reform leader Nigel Farage said the decision to award Hafiz Muhammad Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi was "astonishing". 

How the new General Synod could move beyond the present disagreement over same-sex relationships
How the new General Synod could move beyond the present disagreement over same-sex relationships

How might the next Synod make progress in the next five years based on a recognition that there are those in the Church of England who hold fundamentally opposed positions on the matter? Is there a way of allowing both sides to achieve what they want? Martin Davie argues that the answer to this question is ‘Yes.’

No part of London should become a free speech, gospel exclusion zone
No part of London should become a free speech, gospel exclusion zone

Soho is not exempt from freedom of speech and Christian expression. And Christians do not lose their fundamental freedoms when they cross an invisible boundary into a neighbourhood associated with a different worldview. The streets of London belong to all of us, writes Andrea Williams.

Church of England blessing same-sex relationships 'a bridge too far'
Church of England blessing same-sex relationships 'a bridge too far'

Earlier this year the Church silenced a group of former-homosexuals who wanted to tell of the change in their lives.