CTindex - Christian Today UK Interactive Catalogue
Society

Britain Pro-lifers Row over Cloning License to Dolly's Father

"Science must always exist to benefit humanity - not the other way round."

by Eunice K. Y. Or
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2005, 20:32 (GMT)
Font Scale:A A A

The controversy over cloning has been reignited by the British government as it issued the second human cloning license to the Father of Dolly the Sheep on Tuesday. Scientists, pro-lifers, conservative Christians and patients are all ready to express their differing opinions, and a complicated debate is brewing across the world.

This is the second time such a license has been granted in the UK despite the stern opposition of pro-lifers. In August, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) was strongly criticised for authorising a group of scientist in the Newcastle University to perform cloning of human embryos, so called "therapeutic cloning".

This time, the license falls into the hands of Professor Ian Wilmut of Edinburgh's Roslin Institute, who is the creator of the Dolly the Sheep, the first cloned mammal in the world. Professor Ian Wilmut and the other two scientists are planning to perform the cloning of human embryos so that stem cells can be yielded to investigate a cure for muscle-wasting illnesses. The cloned human embryos will be destroyed afterwards.

Pro-lifers and conservative Christians have generally two major concerns over the cloning of human embryos. First of all, a large number of human embryos will be created for experiments, but end up being destroyed in the laboratories, and so many say the dignity of these living human subjects is being threatened. Secondly, it is worrying that no scientist can guarantee a cloned human embryo will not eventually be implanted to be born.

The UK’s leading pro-life group, LIFE, stated in its press release, "It comes as no great surprise to us that Professor Wilmut has decided to expand his practice of the cloning of animals to the cloning of human beings. Although he has claimed that he is personally opposed to so-called "reproductive" cloning, it is important to highlight that there is no difference in the technique used to clone human embryos for research which he proposes, and cloning human beings to birth. The only difference is in the intended fate of the embryos created."

LIFE Research and PR Officer Patrick Cusworth said, "Everything about the developing human being is decided at the point of fertilisation- whether this occurs through cloning or through natural means. To take such early human life and to disembowel and cannibalise it (in the words of the German Reichstag who banned ALL forms of human cloning), is a profoundly dehumanising process, which lacks any form of medical ethics at all."



continue to read > 1 | 2
Copyright © 2005 Christian Today. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Have your say on this article
Light for Last Days
Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here
Universal Beneficent Society
World Headline
Church leaders press Obama to deliver change

Church leaders press Obama to deliver change

Leaders of two dozen US churches will call on President-elect Barack Obama to lead the nation towards peace and justice...
Sponsored Features
Give a disadvantaged young person a brighter future this Christmas. Order books for all ages commending the free and sovereign grace of Almighty God.
01582 765448 For holidays and retreats in the Scottish borders. Whitchester Christian Guest House 01450 377 477 Friendly printing company for churches, charities and businesses nationwide!
Sanct Maria Abbey, NUNRAW
Cistercian Monastery and Guest House
Bookings: 01620 830 228
Email: nunraw.abbot@yahoo.co.uk
Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here