CTindex - Christian Today UK Interactive Catalogue
Society

Ecstasy debate shouldn't obscure prevention - charity

by Jenna Lyle
Posted: Saturday, September 27, 2008, 13:15 (BST)
Font Scale:A A A

The ongoing debate on whether to downgrade ecstasy should not obscure the need for education, prevention and treatment, says George Ruston, head of Christian drugs education charity Hope UK.

His comments came as the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs met on Friday to discuss ecstasy's current class A status under the Misuse of Drugs Act.

"We must avoid getting obsessed with the legal status of ecstasy," he said. "People will carry on using ecstasy whatever its legal status.

"It is essential that the debate about classification doesn't obscure the need for education, prevention and treatment. Ecstasy is a dangerous drug that can cause tiredness, sleep problems, depression and even death. Psychological dependence can develop."

Mr Ruston warned that any downgrading of the drug should be accompanied by clear statements affirming its illegal status and potential side effects, as well as proper investment in an education and prevention programme "designed to encourage young people to make drug-free choices".

The Advisory Council will publish a report on its recommendations next year, although any final decision on the drug's reclassification will lie with Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

A spokesman for the Home Office was quoted by the Press Association as saying that the Government had no plans to downgrade ecstasy.

"Ecstasy can and does kill unpredictably. There is no such thing as a 'safe dose'," the spokesman said. "The Government firmly believes that ecstasy should remain a Class A drug."



Copyright © 2009 Christian Today. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
The comments below are readers' personal opinions and are in no way intended to reflect the editorial opinion of Christian Today.

Added: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 12:01 (GMT)

George Rushton's comments are both timely and appropiate.

It is interesting to note that much of the debate on the ACMD recommendation to downgrade ecstasy is initiated and perpretuated by what could be described as the 'pro drug lobby'. A group consisting of individuals and organisations, who judging by their comments, appear to be more interested in 'liberalising' drug use, to the point of legalising it, rather than the total harms inflicted by drug use.

Even more disturbing was the eager and warm endorsement, (see Medical News Today under addiction news) that DrugScope, 'the leading authority on drugs and drug policy', who have the declared aim of reducing the harms caused by drugs to users, their families and communities gave to the ACMD recommendation, despite admitting that more research was needed to establish the extent of the harms that ecstasy inflicts

Peter O\'Loughlin, Beckenham

Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here
World Headline
Former Haggard counsellor: We wish he wouldn't do this

Former Haggard counsellor: We wish he wouldn't do this

A member of Ted Haggard’s now-defunct restoration team says he and the others wish the former megachurch pastor would...
Sponsored Features
Bible Educational Services is committed to telling the next generation the praiseworthy deeds of the Lord. Psalm 78: 4. To download free bible lessons or learn about Postal Bible Schools visit Enrich your love life, marriage and relationships through education and counselling. Train to become a certified marriage and family educator and change lives for good.
Google Advertisement
Externally generated - Report offensive links here