From the outset, the film encourages us to see Georgiana as full of joy and vitality, and therefore to feel pity for her being married off to a repressed and selfish bore. Later, we see her love affair with Charles as her chance for happiness. We see the social conventions and morality of Georgian Britain as stifling and imprisoning, forcing her into enduring a dreadful domestic arrangement.
William's hypocrisy rightly appalls us. While Georgiana must play by the rules, he believes he has the liberty to have his mistress live alongside his wife. He is arrogant, manipulative and cruel. But is Countess Spencer nevertheless right to insist that her daughter should go back to him, to do her duty? After all, Georgiana had committed herself to William: she had entered a marriage covenant with him. But William has broken this covenant already, and Georgiana would be perfectly justified in separating from him, even if divorce is impossible. However, when she does the same as her husband and has an affair, she sinks to the same moral level as him.
The Duke's power and women's low standing in law give him the trump card of being able to withhold her access to her children. He backs her into a corner with it, but by renouncing her affair, Georgiana becomes the one who does what is right. She returns to her marriage promise to 'forsake all others' for 'as long as they both shall live', even though he refuses to. Of course, her motivation is not to do the right thing for its own sake, but to be with her children and for them to be with her. But since families are supposed to be about children living with their parents, her motivation and her responsibility coincide.
We easily see this duty in negative terms, because we live in a society that stresses individual freedom and self-fulfilment above everything else. In our culture, promises - even marriage vows - are easily forgotten when a more exciting relationship beckons. But the traditional notion that a wife should be faithful to her husband is right. According to the Bible, it is more than mere convention, but rather a fundamental principle of morality that applies to both men and women at all times and in all places. Seen in this context, the problem with Georgian morality was not the constraint on women, but the belief of wealthy men that they were not subject to the same constraint. William had made the same promises at the altar, yet his concept of duty was so wrong-headed that he felt able to ignore those in favour of maintaining his family's status.
All this sounds quite alien in our culture, with its emphasis on freedom and rights. Everybody is quick to identify what life should be giving them and what they can get from other people, but slow to see what they should be giving and doing for others. Forgiving, reconciling and being faithful are extremely tough things to do, but our society would be very different if we all had a higher regard for such things and saw them as our personal responsibility.
This article was first published on Damaris' Culturewatch website (www.culturewatch.org) - used with permission.
© Copyright Tony Watkins (2008)
